Which type of mortar fire is specifically meant to disrupt enemy operations?

Harassment fires are specifically designed to disrupt enemy operations by applying pressure and creating uncertainty within their ranks. The primary purpose of this type of mortar fire is to limit the enemy's ability to maneuver, resupply, and operate effectively. By continuously applying indirect fire in a sporadic and unpredictable manner, harassment fires can cause psychological stress and hinder the enemy's planned activities.

The intent behind harassment fires is not necessarily to destroy enemy assets, but rather to disrupt their operations, preventing them from carrying out tasks such as troop movements or logistical support. This type of engagement is particularly useful in shaping the battlefield and manipulating the enemy's decision-making.

In contrast, counterfires focus on neutralizing enemy indirect fire capabilities, interdiction fires aim to prevent enemy movement and supply, and close support fires are intended to provide immediate support to friendly forces in close proximity to the enemy. Each of these other forms of fire serves a different operational purpose, emphasizing why harassment fires uniquely fit the description of disrupting enemy operations.